The Azusa Street Revival in Los Angeles in the early 20th century gave birth to the modern Pentecostal and Charismatic …

20 COMMENTS

  1. so are we saved by speaking the name Jesus over us in baptism or do we go by the meaning of any name as long as it means YHWH is salvation.. ( YHWH is Yehushua) ? asking because John 5:43 we can not get Jesus is the Name Peter spoken in Acts 2:38 … Peter said this was spoken by the Prophet Joel .. from Joel ch 2… LORD coverd up the Fathers true Name YHWH (YAHWAH)

  2. I believe on the day of Pentecost, Peter spoke the keys of the Kingdom Acts 2:38, all believers were water baptized in Jesus name. 1, they were now spiritual priests washing priests and applying the shed blood for remission of sins. They were partakers of the 1st fruits. These were the keys to the kingdom spoken by Peter and do not contradict John 3:3,5 and 8, or Matt 28:19.
    Then in Acts we see outpouring in Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria and uttermost parts of the earth. PTL 🎉

  3. One of the biggest deceptions of the enemy next to the trinity delusion which is the same error as oneness theology both teach the same error and those who teach them will answer for their error in the end.

  4. “Pentecost is not over. In fact, it is continually going on in every time and in every place, because the Holy Spirit desired to give himself to all men and all who want him can always receive him, so we do not have to envy the apostles and the first believers; we only have to dispose ourselves like them to receive him well, and he will come to us as he did to them.” – Saint Elena Guerra. Saint Elena Guerra, who was known in the Catholic Church as an apostle of the Holy Spirit wrote to Pope Leo XIII about the Holy Spirit. In response, in 1897, Pope Leo XII told Catholic priests to begin praying for an outpouring of the Holy Spirit to take place in the early 20th century.

  5. Now the truth.. .

    Even Bernard admits in history that Parham ASKED HIS STUDENTS "How would know some has received the Holy Ghost?". Wait, a minute, Wait a minute, does not that mean NO ONE knew in 1900? Yep, they didn't know because it never was!

    So Parham had his students MEET and "DETERMINE" the proof that the evidence of the Holy Ghost is tongues……. So lets be clear, some 1900 YEARS after the Apostle doctrine a group of students in 1900 needed TO INVESTIGAE, again NEEDED to investigate, the evidence of receiving the Holy Ghost.

    All the students (who did not know) did was to make a man-made (really student-made) statement that speaking in tongues is the evidence of receiving the Holy Ghost. And all of this suddenly comes 1900 yr after the Apostles. Really?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here