A channel named Modern Day Debate reached out to me based on my flat earth debunking to see if I would debate someone …
24 COMMENTS
Kent is one of the worst debaters ever what would beating spongebob over the head and being paternising calling a literal professor son when he has zero credentials himself does he not understand how arrogant he comes off as?
This is what I hate about the "belief" system. There is NO empirical data or empirical evidence that anything in the bible is a FACT. The whole structure relating to the bible is a belief system. Nothing written in the bible is observable, or evidentiary. The idea that god created everything is an idea or an assumption at best. There is no evidence to corroborate that and there is no information that can formulate a test to prove or disprove it. Evolution is FACT and evidence based. It is empirical. Evolution has been documented, studied, TESTED and Corroborated over and over again for hundreds of years. I have had this debate many times. "Just cause you believe something doesn't make it a fact". If there is no way to prove it's a fact with empirical evidence,, then at best it's a hypothesis at worst it's outright wrong. Science has absolutely no room for the "belief" system as it doesn't add anything of value to the scientific community.
Lol James said Kent is a very good debater? Lol every time Dave says something or asks a different question, Kent responds with 1 of 5 things, or outright denies what Dave says. Those things in and of themselves make Kent the worst debater in the history of debating. I would love to see Kent go up against Jordan Peterson.
In Ireland we would call Kent the two ends of a bollox and there's one in every bar. There's no winning this fight those who follow him aren't following him for his points or arguments they follow him because he stroked them right. Some might say don't fight him feed him enough rope to hang himself but that won't work with his calibre of fools. Ya same talking point over and over but that doesn't even matter notice the expert timing of his interruptions and when his volume goes up. He's the most proficient gobshite I've ever heard.
This is a silly exercise. You should debate Hugh Ross. Their organization and cadre of research scientists is the only one with a detailed comprehensive explanation of origin of life and other phenomena. Only testable model too. Debating Kent Hovind is an exercise in absurdity.
I do think Dave comes out very aggressive and wanting to correct Kent on everything, but very simply, should of stuck to the hard evidence, let Kent ramble off on his Bible but always bring it back to the core topics of dating of objects to beyond 4000BC, maybe bring in polydactial mutations in humans, and other things, fighting on his own facts instead of on Kent's
Man ….. The people that Dave demolishes will never admit defeat in any way. The only thing I can think of is that their beliefs in something might get so passionate and they get so laser focused on a specific topic that it’s to hurtful to their pride and ego that they spare themselves the embarrassment…. Especially when they put themselves out there on the web for the world to witness lmao
Kent is great at coming up with analogies that appeal to very simple minded uneducated people. He is horrible at discussing complex scientific facts. "It's still a strawberry!!" He keeps yelling it louder and louder. It still doesn't make sense…unless you are simple minded. We have to appeal to the simple minded.
Kent is one of the worst debaters ever what would beating spongebob over the head and being paternising calling a literal professor son when he has zero credentials himself does he not understand how arrogant he comes off as?
Kent Hovind is clearly a con artist.
This is what I hate about the "belief" system. There is NO empirical data or empirical evidence that anything in the bible is a FACT. The whole structure relating to the bible is a belief system. Nothing written in the bible is observable, or evidentiary. The idea that god created everything is an idea or an assumption at best. There is no evidence to corroborate that and there is no information that can formulate a test to prove or disprove it. Evolution is FACT and evidence based. It is empirical. Evolution has been documented, studied, TESTED and Corroborated over and over again for hundreds of years. I have had this debate many times. "Just cause you believe something doesn't make it a fact". If there is no way to prove it's a fact with empirical evidence,, then at best it's a hypothesis at worst it's outright wrong. Science has absolutely no room for the "belief" system as it doesn't add anything of value to the scientific community.
Science doesn't explain how male+female both make evolutionary jumps into new species at the same time …
Lol James said Kent is a very good debater? Lol every time Dave says something or asks a different question, Kent responds with 1 of 5 things, or outright denies what Dave says. Those things in and of themselves make Kent the worst debater in the history of debating. I would love to see Kent go up against Jordan Peterson.
Does this guy think these two organisms have sex then give birth to a dog.
Love how James the moderator beat his Angry Birds high score 4 times during this debate.
In Ireland we would call Kent the two ends of a bollox and there's one in every bar. There's no winning this fight those who follow him aren't following him for his points or arguments they follow him because he stroked them right. Some might say don't fight him feed him enough rope to hang himself but that won't work with his calibre of fools. Ya same talking point over and over but that doesn't even matter notice the expert timing of his interruptions and when his volume goes up. He's the most proficient gobshite I've ever heard.
This is a silly exercise. You should debate Hugh Ross. Their organization and cadre of research scientists is the only one with a detailed comprehensive explanation of origin of life and other phenomena. Only testable model too. Debating Kent Hovind is an exercise in absurdity.
Dave: the destroyer go dave go
Creationism and all other isims are jus con have no evidence
all living and non living things are mutation period
kent should change his name to con
Damn dude, that's a tough gig, debating idiots.
I do think Dave comes out very aggressive and wanting to correct Kent on everything, but very simply, should of stuck to the hard evidence, let Kent ramble off on his Bible but always bring it back to the core topics of dating of objects to beyond 4000BC, maybe bring in polydactial mutations in humans, and other things, fighting on his own facts instead of on Kent's
listening to kent's opening statement was shocking. i'm in awe. so much worse than i imagined.
Man ….. The people that Dave demolishes will never admit defeat in any way. The only thing I can think of is that their beliefs in something might get so passionate and they get so laser focused on a specific topic that it’s to hurtful to their pride and ego that they spare themselves the embarrassment…. Especially when they put themselves out there on the web for the world to witness lmao
“No answer-Some guy “LMAO
Its a shame CTVT never got brought up with how often "dogs produce dogs" was said.
I agree. I will say this. Hovind DOES have degrees. Granted none of them are accredited that I'm aware of.
Kent is great at coming up with analogies that appeal to very simple minded uneducated people. He is horrible at discussing complex scientific facts. "It's still a strawberry!!" He keeps yelling it louder and louder. It still doesn't make sense…unless you are simple minded. We have to appeal to the simple minded.
30:40. An amoeba is a modern organism. Nothing came from an amoeba. An amoeba is a single celled HIGHLY EVOLVED ELITE OF ELITE ORGANISM.
Kent Hovind is a wife beater tax cheat criminal. Kent is a scammer. He is a con artist. He repeats the same tired arguments.
Dave, how do you have the patience to talk with Kent Hovind? He doesn't deserve your time Dave. Kent is worthless.