This video is a response to @JeffNippard, my former client. In chapter 2, Iโ€™ll outline the story where Mike Israetel โ€ฆ

21 COMMENTS

  1. Chapters:

    0:00 Prologue

    0:28 Chapter 1. Introduction

    2:30 โ€“ Chapter 2. The Mike Israetel debacle

    5:10 Chapter 3. An overview of my history with Jeff Nippard, my former client

    5:42 3.1. My critique of Jeff Nippardโ€™s impossible โ€˜bench press specializationโ€™ program

    11:26 3.2. Jeffโ€™s first comment

    13:15 3.3. My critique of Jeffโ€™s โ€˜womenโ€™s specializationโ€™ program

    15:53 3.4. Jeffโ€™s second comment and subsequent consulting offer

    17:53 3.5. My consulting gig

    18:18 3.5.1. The first engagement

    19:08 3.5.2. The second engagement

    19:47 3.6. The disappearing comment

    22:43 Chapter 4. An overview of Jeff Nippardโ€™s response to my critique of Mike Israetelโ€™s PhD thesis

    23:05 4.1. Jeffโ€™s Instagram comments

    24:00 4.2. Jeffโ€™s personal email and Instagram exchanges with me

    25:50 Chapter 5. A critical analysis of Jeff Nippardโ€™s response to my critique of Mike Israetelโ€™s PhD thesis

    26:04 5.1. On Jeffโ€™s Instagram comments

    35:17 5.2. On my personal email and Instagram exchanges with Jeff

    43:10 5.3. My first Decree

    44:07 Chapter 6. Conclusion

  2. Wait I feel like its not that deep D: I think Jeff just wanted to help out Mike since they're friends. People lie for their friends sake all the time. This seems a bit too personal and grandiose ๐Ÿ™ like at 34:20 it sounds like a dramatic monologue LOL. I don't think we need to cancel Jeff for such petty stuff lol.

    I don't even know if writing one bad thesis immediately invalidates Mike's knowledge from his entire 7+ years in university studying the subject. I'm sure he is still considered quite the expert. If not he'd still be quite knowledgeable in the field.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here